<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">cndcgs</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Challenges to national defence in contemporary geopolitical situation</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2538-8959</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2669-2023</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>LKA</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11_2026_DRABEK</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47459/cndcgs.2026.11</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Evaluation of Measurement Accuracy Using MOSKITO TI+ and JIM COMPACT Handheld Optoelectronic Devices Under Various Operating Conditions</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>DRÁBEK</surname>
            <given-names>Jan</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:href="mailto:jan.drabek2@unob.cz">jan.drabek2@unob.cz</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_cndcgs_aff_000"/>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">∗</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_cndcgs_aff_000">Department of Fire Support, Faculty of Military Leadership, University of Defence, Czech Republic</aff>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>TUČEK</surname>
            <given-names>Pavel</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_cndcgs_aff_001"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_cndcgs_aff_001">EXCALIBUR ARMY spol. s r.o., Czech Republic</aff>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>MINAŘÍK</surname>
            <given-names>Václav</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_cndcgs_aff_002"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_cndcgs_aff_002">Department of Air Defence, Faculty of Military Technology, University of Defence, Czech Republic</aff>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>VITOUL</surname>
            <given-names>Viktor</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_cndcgs_aff_003"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_cndcgs_aff_003">Department of Fire Support, Faculty of Military Leadership, University of Defence, Czech Republic</aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="cor1"><label>∗</label>Corresponding author.</corresp>
      </author-notes>
      <volume>2026</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>97</fpage>
      <lpage>106</lpage>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>30</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p>Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY)</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>Handheld optoelectronic devices are a key element in target acquisition in current military operations, especially for artillery reconnaissance and infantry reconnaissance units. This article focuses on a comparative evaluation of two optoelectronic devices of different performance classes, MOSKITO TI+ and JIM COMPACT, both manufactured by Safran Vectronix. The aim of the study is to assess whether the higher technical level of JIM COMPACT leads to a measurable improvement in target location accuracy under various field conditions. Measurements were performed under both ideal and deteriorated conditions (reduced visibility, adverse atmospheric effects) using standardized methodology with reference coordinates determined by geodetic methods. Preliminary results confirm a consistent difference in target localization accuracy between the two devices, with JIM COMPACT demonstrating lower dispersion and higher angular measurement stability, particularly at longer distances and in conditions where orientation accuracy becomes operationally critical.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>optoelectronic devices</kwd>
        <kwd>target acquisition</kwd>
        <kwd>target location accuracy</kwd>
        <kwd>laser rangefinder</kwd>
        <kwd>field experiment</kwd>
        <kwd>military reconnaissance</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
