Contemporary military operations increasingly face incidents in which the nature of the hazard is initially unclear, involving possible chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, explosive, or combined threats. In the Czech military environment, the role allocation between the Military Police and other military actors in uncertain chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives (CBRN-E) incidents is not fully standardized. As a result, the Military Police may be expected to involve in scene control, personnel protection, preservation of evidentiary value, and escalation decisions despite limited organic CBRN capabilities. This article proposes an experimental research design for evaluating Military Police response to uncertain CBRN-E incidents under controlled but operationally realistic conditions. The model integrates tactical, technical, legal, and forensic variables and introduces a structured evaluation framework focused on decision latency, exposure risk, evidentiary integrity, coordination effectiveness, and procedural compliance. The study supports future standardization of response procedures, training, and coordination between the Military Police and specialized military units.
The objective of the research is to analyze if the change of disciplinary action has any impact in the number of disciplinary cases within the Swedish international operations. In the period between the two Swedish international operations in Congo (1960´s) and Bosnia (1990´s), the law changed from being able to place errant soldiers under arrest to being able to punish only by payroll deduction. The results show that the number of cases decreased in Congo but increased in Bosnia.