English serves as the primary operational language of NATO, with proficiency assessed through the STANAG 6001 examination. This study analyses 240 authentic texts produced during the STANAG 6001 Level 2 writing examination at the University of Defence using corpus-based error analysis. Results indicate that failure to achieve Level 2 is mainly caused by systematic morphosyntactic errors and omission of obligatory language elements. Level 2 texts demonstrate greater grammatical accuracy and complexity, with implications for targeted English language instruction in military higher education.
This article examines the key determinants influencing psychological well-being among students in both types of institutions by synthesizing findings from empirical research published in peer-reviewed academic journals. The comparative perspective adopted here aims to illuminate shared challenges as well as the psychosocial specificities of military higher education. Understanding these patterns is particularly relevant in contexts such as the Czech Republic, where military universities operate under the authority of the Ministry of Defence and follow unique structural, educational, and professional mandates. By integrating existing evidence, the article seeks to inform more effective, context-sensitive mental health strategies within both civilian and military academic settings.